Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
21. Slow Boating? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Xenuria so if people can slow boat noctises into deltole sits why don't I ever see any in there? Depends on how far they have to slow boat. One Light Second is roughly 300,000,000 meters. At 500 m/s thats is 600,000 seco...
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.07.04 19:20:00
|
22. Why did you choose the race you did? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
On my 1st character (this one) I had no clues, so it was a shot in the dark of sorts. But my Caldari Science/Builder and Minmater Hauler were picked entirely due to starting attributes. Back then, starting attributes were HEAVILY dependent on rac...
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.07.04 18:55:00
|
23. Noble Exchange will be used for the sale of vanity items only - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
From the lastest Blog "It is CCPæs plan that the Noble Exchange (NeX store) will be used for the sale of vanity items only." Thank You CCP. Thats all you needed to say. Play nice while you butcher each other.
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.07.02 18:13:00
|
24. Re: An update on pending CCP and CSM statements - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Riedle Y'all realize that you are raging at a gaming company that produces an MMO that you fly an imaginary internet spacehip in - to release a statement , right? I mean - on the list of things to get upset about in life...
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.07.02 12:18:00
|
25. Remove Aug and instead sell vanity items for ISK directly - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Selling vanity stuff for silly amounts of RL money is fine. What has people up in arms is that there are proven documents that CCP was seriously thinking of selling non-vanity stuff for RL money. PLEX is bad enough, but at least it has a few vir...
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.07.01 04:15:00
|
26. Why worry about power MT when PLEX are already "buy to win"? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Sergeant Spot on 30/06/2011 00:58:13 Justifying adding AUR to game for non-vanity by citing PLEX is an argument AGAINST allowing AUR to purchace non-vanity. PLEX needs no company, its already a nasty feature in its own right. Non-...
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.06.30 00:58:00
|
27. Why worry about power MT when PLEX are already "buy to win"? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I will agree, strongly, that Eve would be better off without PLEX. However. PLEX has two factors that PARTLY redeem it (I still don't like PLEX, but I can hold my nose and stomach PLEX....) 1. ALL Isk gained by players selling PLEX was grinded ...
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.06.29 22:37:00
|
28. A Quote from SOE president - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Originally by: Adrian Schultze Edited by: Adrian Schultze on 28/06/2011 14:46:30 Edited by: Adrian Schultze on 28/06/2011 14:43:42 Edited by: Adrian Schultze on 28/06/2011 14:38:01 Yeah, but DAoC is not a good exmple of what is...
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.06.29 16:32:00
|
29. Would you consider being a CCP shareholder - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Icecold Spacebeer In general? Yes. Currently? No. CCP has only one valuable asset in their financial report, their code. But code is only worth what someone is paying for it, so in reality they have only one other "asset": ...
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.06.28 16:45:00
|
30. "Every Item In Game is Made by Players" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Transporter Slave Edited by: Transporter Slave on 28/06/2011 11:15:28 Originally by: Sergeant Spot Drops and rewards are also 'made' by players (they don't enter the game without IN GAME player effort). You...
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.06.28 11:43:00
|
31. Collection of (Most) non-vanity suggestions from multiple threads. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
OP has a few line items that would affect Concord. NONE of those line items would be 'vanity'. ALL of them would be "Pay for pvp advantage". Probably a few other questionable ones too, but the Concord affecting ones stand out as really poor ideas...
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.06.28 10:57:00
|
32. "Every Item In Game is Made by Players" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Blane Xero Originally by: Maa Ku Originally by: Jasdemi Edited by: Jasdemi on 28/06/2011 10:45:04 "Every Item In Game is Made by Players" is completely false. Pathetic noob. Doesn't even know anything ab...
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.06.28 10:50:00
|
33. Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ai Mei Funny the way the dev blog over the weekend reads it says they will never go beyond vanity items. It says they won't be selling "gold ammo". We need something a bit broader. For example: "CCP will not any sort o...
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.06.27 22:14:00
|
34. Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tugrath Akers Originally by: Sergeant Spot Wrong Extremely wrong. For good or ill, such behavior goes to the core of professional ethics. They have spelled it out plain as day. The only question is how long t...
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.06.27 21:58:00
|
35. Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tugrath Akers Originally by: Sergeant Spot Then CCP needs to SAY THAT. Bluntly, and without wiggle room. They shouldn't have to. Wrong Extremely wrong. For good or ill, such behavior goes to the core of pr...
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.06.27 21:50:00
|
36. GIVE IDEAS for NON-vanity, NON-advantage items and services for AUR ! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I strongly support CCP improving their income with the sale of good and services that are not "Fee for pvp advantage". Go for it, and I no joke wish you all the best. Play nice while you butcher each other.
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.06.27 21:48:00
|
37. Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tugrath Akers All signs point to moving beyond vanity aur items eventually. Better to accept this now. Then CCP needs to SAY THAT. Bluntly, and without wiggle room. Play nice while you butcher each other.
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.06.27 21:45:00
|
38. Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items? The above question will NOT go away. CCP, Eve is your property to do with as you wish. But there is such a thing as Professional Ethics, which come into play for a variety of reasons, including HO...
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.06.27 21:35:00
|
39. CCP Zulu: answer the question - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Shadow XII Edited by: Shadow XII on 26/06/2011 16:58:17 Originally by: Da Gooch Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items? CCP ZULU DO YOU SEE THE QUESTION ABOVE? CAN YOU READ IT? GOOD, NOW LISTEN UP.. WE ...
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.06.27 21:16:00
|
40. Core Issue for Emergency CSM Meeting - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
The Statement we REQUIRE from CCP: 1. AUR will never be used to sell items that in any way could even mildly be viewed as "Pay to Win". 2. If, during debate on legit uses of AUR, the topic of PLEX comes up as a justification for selling a certai...
- by Sergeant Spot - at 2011.06.26 19:15:00
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |